Figure Sets
Capture figure sets using a <fig-group>
element.
<fig-group>
elements must not be captured as a child of
<p>
they must instead be a direct child of the parent
structure (usually a <sec>
or <body>
element).
<fig-group>
must have the following attributes:Attribute Name | Attribute Value |
---|---|
id | [FigID] |
content-type | figureset |
position | float |
<fig-group>
element must have a
<caption>
child element. The <caption>
element must contain:- A
<title>
element - The text of the caption in one or more
<p>
elements. - The linking text that appears in the print version in a
<p>
element with a@content-type
attribute of valueprint
. - The linking text that appears in the online version in a
<p>
element with a@content-type
attribute of valueonline
. - The figure set title in a
<p>
element with a@content-type
attribute of valuefigureset
. - The description of the figure set parts in a
<p>
element with a@content-type
attribute of valuenumparts
.
Optionally an <inline-supplementary-material>
may be used as a
child of caption to capture the file name of the tar of the figure set (see Inline Supplementary Data)
Each <fig-group>
element must contain at least two child
<fig>
elements. These <fig>
elements
must follow the standard instructions found here: Figures with the
exception that <label>
and <caption>
child
elements are mandatory.
The <caption>
element of each individual
<fig>
in the figure set must have two child
<p>
elements. One containing the figsetgrptitle
and
one containing the figsetgrpnote
from the TeX input.
Example
<fig-group content-type="figureset" id="apjac5970f1" position="float"> <caption> <title>Figure 1.</title> <p>Analysis of the stacked RC for Bin 5 of the spiral galaxy sample by Persic et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="apjac5970bib85">1996</xref>). The top left panel illustrate the RC curve data (open symbols) and the best-fit model for the Burkert (cyan line), NFW (orange line), and NMC profile (red line). The outcome of the Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo parameter estimations are shown as corner plots for the Burkert profile (top-right panel), for the NFW profile (bottom left), and for the NMC model (bottom right, with purple contours representing the posterior when the halo concentration is constrained by the relation of Dutton & Macciò <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="apjac5970bib36">2014</xref>, given by Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="apjac5970eqn18">18</xref>)).</p> <p content-type="print">(The complete figure set (11 images) is available in the <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac5970">online article</ext-link>.)</p> <p content-type="online">(The <inline-supplementary-material content-type="Tar file" xlink:title="Tarball of figure set images" xlink:href="apjac5970figset1.tar.gz">complete figure set</inline-supplementary-material> (11 images) is available.)</p> <p content-type="figureset">Analysis of the stacked RCs for the spiral galaxy sample by Persic et al. (1996).</p> <p content-type="numparts">Figure 1.1–1.11 (1 of 11 images)</p> </caption> <fig fig-type="print" id="apjac5970f1_pr" position="float"> <graphic content-type="print" id="apjac5970f1_eps" xlink:href="apjac5970f1.eps"/> <graphic content-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_lr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_lr.jpg"/> <graphic content-type="high" id="apjac5970f1_hr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_hr.jpg"/> </fig> <fig fig-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_1" position="float"> <label>Figure 1.1.</label> <caption> <p>Bin 1 of PSS96</p> <p>Analysis of the stacked RC of the spiral galaxy sample by Persic et al. (1996). The top left panel illustrate the RC curve data (open symbols) and the best-fit model for the Burkert (cyan line), NFW (orange line) and NMC profile (red line). The outcome of the Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation are shown as corner plots for the Burkert profile (top right panel), for the NFW profile (bottom left) and for the NMC model (bottom right, with purple contours representing the posterior when the halo concentration is constrained by the relation of Dutton & Macciò (2014) given by Equation (18)).</p> </caption> <graphic content-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_1_lr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_1_lr.jpg"/> <graphic content-type="high" id="apjac5970f1_1_hr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_1_hr.jpg"/> </fig> <fig fig-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_2" position="float"> <label>Figure 1.2.</label> <caption> <p>Bin 2 of PSS96</p> <p>Analysis of the stacked RC of the spiral galaxy sample by Persic et al. (1996). The top left panel illustrate the RC curve data (open symbols) and the best-fit model for the Burkert (cyan line), NFW (orange line) and NMC profile (red line). The outcome of the Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation are shown as corner plots for the Burkert profile (top right panel), for the NFW profile (bottom left) and for the NMC model (bottom right, with purple contours representing the posterior when the halo concentration is constrained by the relation of Dutton & Macciò (2014) given by Equation (18)).</p> </caption> <graphic content-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_2_lr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_2_lr.jpg"/> <graphic content-type="high" id="apjac5970f1_2_hr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_2_hr.jpg"/> </fig> <fig fig-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_3" position="float"> <label>Figure 1.3.</label> <caption> <p>Bin 3 of PSS96</p> <p>Analysis of the stacked RC of the spiral galaxy sample by Persic et al. (1996). The top left panel illustrate the RC curve data (open symbols) and the best-fit model for the Burkert (cyan line), NFW (orange line) and NMC profile (red line). The outcome of the Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation are shown as corner plots for the Burkert profile (top right panel), for the NFW profile (bottom left) and for the NMC model (bottom right, with purple contours representing the posterior when the halo concentration is constrained by the relation of Dutton & Macciò (2014) given by Equation (18)).</p> </caption> <graphic content-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_3_lr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_3_lr.jpg"/> <graphic content-type="high" id="apjac5970f1_3_hr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_3_hr.jpg"/> </fig> <fig fig-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_4" position="float"> <label>Figure 1.4.</label> <caption> <p>Bin 4 of PSS96</p> <p>Analysis of the stacked RC of the spiral galaxy sample by Persic et al. (1996). The top left panel illustrate the RC curve data (open symbols) and the best-fit model for the Burkert (cyan line), NFW (orange line) and NMC profile (red line). The outcome of the Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation are shown as corner plots for the Burkert profile (top right panel), for the NFW profile (bottom left) and for the NMC model (bottom right, with purple contours representing the posterior when the halo concentration is constrained by the relation of Dutton & Macciò (2014) given by Equation (18)).</p> </caption> <graphic content-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_4_lr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_4_lr.jpg"/> <graphic content-type="high" id="apjac5970f1_4_hr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_4_hr.jpg"/> </fig> <fig fig-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_5" position="float"> <label>Figure 1.5.</label> <caption> <p>Bin 5 of PSS96</p> <p>Analysis of the stacked RC of the spiral galaxy sample by Persic et al. (1996). The top left panel illustrate the RC curve data (open symbols) and the best-fit model for the Burkert (cyan line), NFW (orange line) and NMC profile (red line). The outcome of the Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation are shown as corner plots for the Burkert profile (top right panel), for the NFW profile (bottom left) and for the NMC model (bottom right, with purple contours representing the posterior when the halo concentration is constrained by the relation of Dutton & Macciò (2014) given by Equation (18)).</p> </caption> <graphic content-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_5_lr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_5_lr.jpg"/> <graphic content-type="high" id="apjac5970f1_5_hr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_5_hr.jpg"/> </fig> <fig fig-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_6" position="float"> <label>Figure 1.6.</label> <caption> <p>Bin 6 of PSS96</p> <p>Analysis of the stacked RC of the spiral galaxy sample by Persic et al. (1996). The top left panel illustrate the RC curve data (open symbols) and the best-fit model for the Burkert (cyan line), NFW (orange line) and NMC profile (red line). The outcome of the Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation are shown as corner plots for the Burkert profile (top right panel), for the NFW profile (bottom left) and for the NMC model (bottom right, with purple contours representing the posterior when the halo concentration is constrained by the relation of Dutton & Macciò (2014) given by Equation (18)).</p> </caption> <graphic content-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_6_lr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_6_lr.jpg"/> <graphic content-type="high" id="apjac5970f1_6_hr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_6_hr.jpg"/> </fig> <fig fig-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_7" position="float"> <label>Figure 1.7.</label> <caption> <p>Bin 7 of PSS96</p> <p>Analysis of the stacked RC of the spiral galaxy sample by Persic et al. (1996). The top left panel illustrate the RC curve data (open symbols) and the best-fit model for the Burkert (cyan line), NFW (orange line) and NMC profile (red line). The outcome of the Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation are shown as corner plots for the Burkert profile (top right panel), for the NFW profile (bottom left) and for the NMC model (bottom right, with purple contours representing the posterior when the halo concentration is constrained by the relation of Dutton & Macciò (2014) given by Equation (18)).</p> </caption> <graphic content-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_7_lr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_7_lr.jpg"/> <graphic content-type="high" id="apjac5970f1_7_hr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_7_hr.jpg"/> </fig> <fig fig-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_8" position="float"> <label>Figure 1.8.</label> <caption> <p>Bin 8 of PSS96</p> <p>Analysis of the stacked RC of the spiral galaxy sample by Persic et al. (1996). The top left panel illustrate the RC curve data (open symbols) and the best-fit model for the Burkert (cyan line), NFW (orange line) and NMC profile (red line). The outcome of the Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation are shown as corner plots for the Burkert profile (top right panel), for the NFW profile (bottom left) and for the NMC model (bottom right, with purple contours representing the posterior when the halo concentration is constrained by the relation of Dutton & Macciò (2014) given by Equation (18)).</p> </caption> <graphic content-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_8_lr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_8_lr.jpg"/> <graphic content-type="high" id="apjac5970f1_8_hr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_8_hr.jpg"/> </fig> <fig fig-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_9" position="float"> <label>Figure 1.9.</label> <caption> <p>Bin 9 of PSS96</p> <p>Analysis of the stacked RC of the spiral galaxy sample by Persic et al. (1996). The top left panel illustrate the RC curve data (open symbols) and the best-fit model for the Burkert (cyan line), NFW (orange line) and NMC profile (red line). The outcome of the Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation are shown as corner plots for the Burkert profile (top right panel), for the NFW profile (bottom left) and for the NMC model (bottom right, with purple contours representing the posterior when the halo concentration is constrained by the relation of Dutton & Macciò (2014) given by Equation (18)).</p> </caption> <graphic content-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_9_lr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_9_lr.jpg"/> <graphic content-type="high" id="apjac5970f1_9_hr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_9_hr.jpg"/> </fig> <fig fig-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_10" position="float"> <label>Figure 1.10.</label> <caption> <p>Bin 10 of PSS96</p> <p>Analysis of the stacked RC of the spiral galaxy sample by Persic et al. (1996). The top left panel illustrate the RC curve data (open symbols) and the best-fit model for the Burkert (cyan line), NFW (orange line) and NMC profile (red line). The outcome of the Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation are shown as corner plots for the Burkert profile (top right panel), for the NFW profile (bottom left) and for the NMC model (bottom right, with purple contours representing the posterior when the halo concentration is constrained by the relation of Dutton & Macciò (2014) given by Equation (18)).</p> </caption> <graphic content-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_10_lr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_10_lr.jpg"/> <graphic content-type="high" id="apjac5970f1_10_hr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_10_hr.jpg"/> </fig> <fig fig-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_11" position="float"> <label>Figure 1.11.</label> <caption> <p>Bin 11 of PSS96</p> <p>Analysis of the stacked RC of the spiral galaxy sample by Persic et al. (1996). The top left panel illustrate the RC curve data (open symbols) and the best-fit model for the Burkert (cyan line), NFW (orange line) and NMC profile (red line). The outcome of the Bayesian MCMC parameter estimation are shown as corner plots for the Burkert profile (top right panel), for the NFW profile (bottom left) and for the NMC model (bottom right, with purple contours representing the posterior when the halo concentration is constrained by the relation of Dutton & Macciò (2014) given by Equation (18)).</p> </caption> <graphic content-type="online" id="apjac5970f1_11_lr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_11_lr.jpg"/> <graphic content-type="high" id="apjac5970f1_11_hr" xlink:href="apjac5970f1_11_hr.jpg"/> </fig> </fig-group>